- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
- RedCents
- 869¢
SK-SHM-BRD-MAG-MAG-BST
I keep most characters FTP a lot of the time, so the pet classes do well FTP.
I keep most characters FTP a lot of the time, so the pet classes do well FTP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BST are good DPS, HUGE DPS on burns, and combat proc/fero/mana and end regen, and pet can off tank in a pinch (and bst can patch heal also). Once "modern" EQ started, they forked from shm and now both have tools for the group that are separate.Can someone explain to me what makes BST so sexy these days in the box groups?
I currently run SK, Cleric, Bard, Wiz, Zerker, Monk/Mag
Been curious whether it maybe more fun to switch in a beast for the Wiz (even though Wiz DPS is insane, variety is nice).
Also how does Rog do in the LS days? It's the only class besides Ranger/Druid I haven't played at 125.
Bst does comparable damage to Zrk and brings 10x as much utility to a group. They're just the shit.Can someone explain to me what makes BST so sexy these days in the box groups?
I currently run SK, Cleric, Bard, Wiz, Zerker, Monk/Mag
Been curious whether it maybe more fun to switch in a beast for the Wiz (even though Wiz DPS is insane, variety is nice).
Also how does Rog do in the LS days? It's the only class besides Ranger/Druid I haven't played at 125.
Say what?Rogue still brings a lot of damage although they are probably the lowest DPS out of all the melee classes at this point. Just like almost any class though, they bring a lot of unique utility. For that reason alone I believe they're very valuable to any melee group.
It's not like I'm saying they're bad at all? And I'm really not trying to start an argument here. I just meant their raw dps is generally outclassed by others. Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know. I'm just going based off what I've seen in my play.Say what?
Since the body type changes, rog and rangers have been kings of melee dps. The recent change to zerkers brought them back up, but rogues in groups and raids shred stuff currently. I was commenting cause thats 180 out from what ive seenIt's not like I'm saying they're bad at all? And I'm really not trying to start an argument here. I just meant their raw dps is generally outclassed by others. Maybe I'm wrong, I don't know. I'm just going based off what I've seen in my play.
Okay, sorry. I thought the post was accurate.Since the body type changes, rog and rangers have been kings of melee dps. The recent change to zerkers brought them back up, but rogues in groups and raids shred stuff currently. I was commenting cause thats 180 out from what ive seen
Yea, unfortunately the shaman > all paradigm is a 100+ situation. They do lack in the healing department up until that point and are much better as a support role with slows/Dots pet and proc buffs in the 1-75 rangeSHD, SHM, CLR, RNG, BRD, ZERK
I found that shaman alone didn't carry the same healing I needed with cleric.
at level 70 my SK (non raid geared) can easily tank 3-4 yellow con in-era mobs.
Without cleric (I tried with a group'd monk) I found we killed a lot faster, but when we got a bunch of adds the healing just wasn't there.
Since the body type changes, rog and rangers have been kings of melee dps. The recent change to zerkers brought them back up, but rogues in groups and raids shred stuff currently. I was commenting cause thats 180 out from what ive seen
Rangers have to bow + 2hd pierce, and be mana supported (they burn though it). Why they are not super popular with boxers, or hand players.Interesting to see this on rangers. Everyone seems to recommend bst, rog, zerk for melee. Recently monk has jumped in there.
I was considering leveling up a ranger just because they are a little more interesting than a pure melee class, but I wasn't sure where they actually sit in group dps.
Rangers have to bow + 2hd pierce, and be mana supported (they burn though it). Why they are not super popular with boxers, or hand players.
Are you asking automated, or hand played?How do they stack up in a group with bard, shm, bst support and using cwtn? From what I've gathered Rangers seem unhappy with their current raid dps, but I don't really care about that.
Granted any reasonable combination of dps seems fine in the group setting.
Are you asking automated, or hand played?
i have RNG in my group automation in tight spaces can be tricky... for that i swap him for rogue.... and I'm going to replace him with a monk ....Rangers have to bow + 2hd pierce, and be mana supported (they burn though it). Why they are not super popular with boxers, or hand players.